Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Articles


Subject: South China Sea: The "Shared Interest" of India and US


Date: 2014-11-26 14:02
Hit: 6257[vote_start]
 
South China Sea: The "Shared Interest" of India and US

Jiye Kim, Researcher, Korea Research Institute for Military Affairs

The India-US Joint Statement, released following the meeting between India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Barack Obama on September 30, suggests the tasks that the two countries will pursue to deepen and strengthen the bilateral relationship.  The statement consists of five different themes, which are economic growth, energy and climate change, defence and homeland security cooperation, high technology, space and health cooperation and global issues and regional consultations. The inclusion of the global issues and regional consultations in the statement has shown that India and the US do not have many disparities in their views on various global and security issues. The South China Sea (SCS) dispute was also mentioned, along with other issues from the security perspective.

Their common view on the SCS dispute is related to their Asia-centred policies, which are at the intersection of their foreign policy directions. The two countries are pursuing a synergy effect in Asia via their bilateral collaboration in the region. The joint statement states that “the leaders committed to work more closely with other Asia Pacific countries”, noting “India’s “Act East” policy” – the new version of the Look East policy – and “the United States’ rebalance to Asia”. Japan was first mentioned as their partner for trilateral cooperation in the Asia Pacific, followed by the necessity of infrastructure connectivity for integrating economies in South, Southeast, and Central Asia. Their new agreement to expand joint development in third countries was also introduced.

The “shared interest” of India and the US “in preserving regional peace and stability” has enabled them to present their ‘shared attitude’ towards current global and regional security issues. Significantly, the SCS, with critical geo-political significance, was mentioned before Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and North Korea in the statement. In regard to the SCS, India and the US “called on all parties to avoid the use, or threat of use, of force” and to respect “international law” when engaging in territorial and maritime disputes. They suggested three main shared interests in maritime spheres, “especially in the South China Sea”: safeguarding maritime security, ensuring freedom of navigation, and overflights throughout the region.

“Act East” and “Rebalance to Asia”

The reason the two parties can generate the same arguments with one voice, in regard to the SCS dispute, lies in the troubles they currently experience in the same area. The US has been at loggerheads with China — for example, the recent near-collision between a Chinese fighter and an American surveillance aircraft that was flying in China’s offshore exclusive economic zone (EEZ). China and the US had conflicts in the SCS when a US survey ship was confronted by a Chinese naval frigate in China’s EEZ in 2001, and when a Chinese fighter collided with a US EP-3 surveillance plane off the coast of Hainan in the same year. In 2009, Chinese vessels blocked and surrounded a US surveillance ship, the Impeccable, at the similar area to the 2001 EP-3 incident.

Lmodi-xiikewise, India’s footprint in the SCS is one of the external variables that could interfere with China’s absolute superior influence in the region. India has its interest in the natural resources buried in the SCS, and China diplomatically complained against India’s hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation projects in the SCS off the coast of Vietnam since 2011.  Despite China’s negative response, in the summit meeting between India and Vietnam held in November 2013, Vietnam offered seven oil blocks in the SCS, and agreed to strengthen bilateral cooperation in natural gas and oil explorations. Furthermore, in the recent meeting between President Pranab Mukherjee and President Truong Tan Sang in Hanoi on September 15, 2014, India and Vietnam signed seven bilateral cooperation agreements, including an agreement on the exploration of two additional oil blocks off Vietnam by an overseas arm of Indian oil company ONGC (OVL), and Petro Vietnam. It is not a new attempt given that OVL explored and exploited in the SCS in collaboration with Vietnamese companies since 1988 as a commercial activity.  Under the directions of the newly introduced “Act East” policy, India will strengthen and diversify its economic cooperation in South and East Asian countries more progressively, as has been epitomised by its “Look East” policy since the 1990s.

India’s careful approach to China, however, anticipates that India would not be proactively engaged in political conflict against China. During his recent visit to the US, Modi’s answer to a question raised in a conversation in the Council on Foreign Relations has implied that India considers status quo and stabilisation to be its first security priority for pursuing its national interest in bilateral cooperation with Asian countries, including China.  In regard to the question about the India-China border dispute, he did not criticise China, but said that “China and India are in direct talks, and that is why there is no need for a separate arbitration” at this moment. The spokesperson of India’s Ministry of External Affairs also said in August after the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting, as an answer to a question on India’s interaction with China on the SCS issue, that China was an important country and a neighbour with which India had very cordial relations.  Similarly, President Pranab Mukherjee pointed out that India did not make any comment about the sovereignty issue over the SCS.

The SCS-related agreement in the India-US Joint Statement indicates that a stable and peaceful SCS has become a common interest for India and the US, while India is expanding its partnerships with Asian countries to maximise its national interest. The request for a peaceful SCS from India goes beyond a normative and moral stance of a major country in the region. Meanwhile, India’s eclectic approach is aimed at both its national interest and maintaining amicable relations with its big neighbour. The Indian factor in the current SCS dispute is another influential variable and is instilling more dynamics that China should deal with carefully.

(This article by Jiye Kim, a researcher of KRIMA, has been also published in India Writes)
  -list  
의견(코멘트)을 작성하실 수 없습니다. 이유: 권한이 없는 회원레벨
no subject date hit
25  123 2017-05-11 134
24  US and Chinese tempers rise in the South China Sea 2015-11-29 14006
23  The Gulf and South Korea – Political Relations and Strategic Options in a Developing Scenario 2015-11-08 15342
22  Asian Threat Assessment and Its Application to GCC - Dr. Kim Jinwoog 2015-11-08 14818
21  Desirable Civil-Military Relations in the Gulf 2015-08-27 18011
20  Modi Wave in Seoul: A New Phase of South Korea-India Relations 2015-05-22 16895
19  China’s 4 Principles in the South China Sea Dispute 2014-11-26 9090
 South China Sea: The "Shared Interest" of India and US 2014-11-26 6257
17  The Apex Predator’s Self-Defence: A Letter from the Editor 2014-09-25 8305
16  ROK-PRC Relations and the Future of Northeast Asian Security 2014-08-11 7784
15    [re] ROK-PRC Relations and the Future of Northeast Asian Security 2014-08-12 9128
14  Presentation for Ph. D. Viva by Kim Jinwoog 2014-08-04 7279
13  India- South Korea Strategic Partnership (by Dr. Jojin V. John) 2014-07-31 8662
12  Opening Statement: Joint Civil-Military Discussion for the Development of Operation Plan 2014-06-23 7368
11  US plays down North Korea threat - BBC News 2013-04-07 6976
10  South Korea an able partner in India's quest for nuke energy? 2012-03-26 7986
9  [Mail from friend] Dear Kim, This is about the issue of UFK 2011-11-03 8962
8  "The more divided we are at home, the more we yield advantage to the adversary." 2010-07-12 7826
7  HANGUL DAY Speech (by Kim Jin Woog) 2009-10-10 8951
6  THE IMPORTANCE OF “KOREA-CHINA SECURITY FORUM”: ISSUES AND DIRECTIONS.. 2009-09-23 9000
-list  -next page  
1   2  
Copyright 1999-2017 Zeroboard / skin by DQ

Untitled Document
Korea Research Institute for Military Affairs | Korea Defense Review
Copyright (C) 1995-2013 All Rights Reserved T: +82 2 842 3105 F: +82 2 842 3108
Contact Us