Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Untitled Document

Subject: US plays down North Korea threat - BBC News

Date: 2013-04-07 04:52
Hit: 12015[vote_start]
US officials have played down the threat of war on the Korean peninsula, after weeks of bellicose statements from Pyongyang.

A White House spokesman said the US "would not be surprised" if North Korea launched a missile, while a top US military officer said recent threats appeared to fit a familiar pattern.

Pyongyang has threatened to attack both US and South Korean targets.

It has told foreign embassies it cannot guarantee their safety in a conflict.

Diplomats in Pyongyang were asked on Friday to tell the foreign ministry by 10 April what help they would need in evacuating.

The warning prompted Russia to ask whether Pyongyang was offering help in the event of a conflict, or making a decision.

South Korean media reported on Friday that the North had moved two intermediate range missiles into position on the east coast.

The missiles are untested but it is believed they could reach as far as the Pacific Island of Guam, where the US has a military base, and where it has confirmed it will deploy a missile defence system.

Yonhap, the South Korean news agency, said two warships equipped with Aegis defence systems would monitor the situation.

Joh Sudworth says that North Korea's warning on diplomats has been met with bemusement in the South

North Korea has issued a series of unusually strong threats since it was sanctioned by the UN in March for having carried out a third nuclear test.

It has threatened nuclear strikes on the US, formally declared war on the South, and pledged to reopen a nuclear reactor in defiance of UN Security Council resolutions.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said on Friday a missile launch would not be unexpected.

"We would not be surprised to see them take such an action,'' he said. "We have seen them launch missiles in the past.''

Seoul has also played down the North's reported missile move, saying it may be planning a test rather than a hostile act.

Gen Martin Dempsey, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, called the North's nuclear threat "reckless", but said it seemed to fit a decades-long pattern of escalation followed by accommodation.

"I wouldn't say I see anything to lead me to believe that this is a different kind of cycle,'' he told the Associated Press news agency.
Continue reading the main story        
Aegis missile defence system
USS John S McCain

Allows warships to shoot down enemy ballistic missiles while they are still in space
Interceptors are fired to hit missiles before they re-enter the atmosphere
The US, South Korea and Japan all have Aegis capability
Mobilising the propagandists
How potent are threats?
Business as usual in South
N Korea's missile programme
Guide: Missile defences in the region

Even so, Gen Dempsey said the cycle was more unpredictable because relatively little was known about North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, who came to power after his father's death in December 2011.

"Though we've always said that North Korea has been a bit opaque to us, in the past we've understood their leadership and the influencers a little better than we do today," he said.

Many of North Korea's angry statements have cited the annual military exercises between US and South Korean forces as provocation.

The US flew nuclear-capable B2 and B52 bombers over the South as part of the drill, and has since deployed warships with missile defence systems to the region.

Gen Dempsey said US moves had been "largely defensive and exclusively intended to reassure our allies".

The BBC's Lucy Williamson reports from Seoul that the heightened atmosphere could make any action riskier for North Korea.

With military communication lines cut, even an unarmed test-flight of its rockets could be misconstrued, and any glitch in flight path or target could lead to a major escalation, she adds.

North Korea has not taken direct military action since 2010, when it shelled a South Korean island and killed four people.

Despite its warning that it could not guarantee the safety of foreign embassies, both Russia and the UK said they had no immediate plans to evacuate their embassies in Pyongyang.
의견(코멘트)을 작성하실 수 없습니다. 이유: 권한이 없는 회원레벨
no subject date hit
24  [2008.02] Restoring the relationship between South korea and U.S. for solving the D.P.R.K Nuclear. 2008-03-05 9763
23  [2008.06.26] Text of Bush remarks on North Korea 2008-06-28 8991
22  [2009.02] Editorial: Future Security Paradigm of Korean Peninsula. 2009-04-07 9271
21  [2009.05] NUCLEAR POLICIES OF NORTH KOREA: THE IMPLICATION ON EAST ASIAN SECURITY (by Mahendra Prakash) 2009-05-09 10348
20  [2009.05] The Future of Six-Party Talks (by Kim Jin-Wook) 2009-05-12 12340
18  HANGUL DAY Speech (by Kim Jin Woog) 2009-10-10 15553
17  "The more divided we are at home, the more we yield advantage to the adversary." 2010-07-12 12183
16  [Mail from friend] Dear Kim, This is about the issue of UFK 2011-11-03 39336
15  South Korea an able partner in India's quest for nuke energy? 2012-03-26 14377
 US plays down North Korea threat - BBC News 2013-04-07 12015
13  Opening Statement: Joint Civil-Military Discussion for the Development of Operation Plan 2014-06-23 11972
12  India- South Korea Strategic Partnership (by Dr. Jojin V. John) 2014-07-31 25742
11  Presentation for Ph. D. Viva by Kim Jinwoog 2014-08-04 11656
10  ROK-PRC Relations and the Future of Northeast Asian Security 2014-08-11 12201
9    [re] ROK-PRC Relations and the Future of Northeast Asian Security 2014-08-12 14237
8  The Apex Predator’s Self-Defence: A Letter from the Editor 2014-09-25 12830
7  South China Sea: The "Shared Interest" of India and US 2014-11-26 11354
6  China’s 4 Principles in the South China Sea Dispute 2014-11-26 14148
5  Modi Wave in Seoul: A New Phase of South Korea-India Relations 2015-05-22 26201
-list  -next page  
1   2  
Copyright 1999-2022 Zeroboard / skin by DQ

Untitled Document
Korea Research Institute for Military Affairs | Korea Defense Review
Copyright (C) 1995-2013 All Rights Reserved T: +82 2 842 3105 F: +82 2 842 3108
Contact Us